Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Even stupidest things like allowing to have more dockerfiles in one folder.

Wow. That issue has been open for a long time.



I've been involved in that ticket since the dark ages. There's a philosophical disconnect between how (some) people want to use Docker and how the maintainers want it to be used, and it comes to a head in that thread.


I saw your articulate response in that thread. Thank you for that response. I don't need multiple dockerfiles right now, but if i invest more into docker, I will. I think your responses might have convinced shykes that the need won't be going away.

There was a similar disconnect on data volumes a while ago that took some convincing before the discussion moved forward. It has always been trivial in OpenVZ to bind mount into a container (ie: share a very large read-only mount between containers).


For anyone else trying to follow along (and still evaluating docker at a distance), start with this comment in that thread:

https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/2112#issuecomment-39...

It gets quite interesting, and it's still going 14 months later...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: