Simple - you need to assign blame, and you need to do it in a fair way.
Any assingement of blame of using unauthorized LLM generated content could be shifted to external contractor(preferably outside of EU's jurisdiction) where you yourself had no awareness of it. Contract of course explicitly forbids LLM content and requires labeling.
This is and extremely basic loophole that gives enough plausible deniability to any sane publisher/content farm.
Now you need to prove they were aware of LLM content being generated, as they cannot rely on LLM content detection methods due to high amount of false positives.
Even easier if you publish content from people writing under pseudonyms/anonymously. It devolves into he said she said kind of situation, and burden of proof is on accusers side.
Basically depending on enforcement this system either:
- only punishes small players that cannot afford to setup such chain
- is used as an arbitrary excuse to shut some outlets
Yeah, i basically guide it by writing docs, tests, then code. Then try to get it looping that way. It occasionally happens reliably. If it can reliable prune context itd be pretty close to autonomous. If it achievef that, id sit down and plan out much larger scopes but for now, its just feat->docs->tests|code->loop till done.
this feels like "make no mistakes" level of prompting. reliable software isn't as simple as making it reliable, it's about choosing the trade-offs in the areas that don't matter as much as the areas that do. if you keep prompting the LLM to make your software more robust it will keep giving you things to do. they aren't all good things. eventually you'll end up needing kubernetes to run a calculator app.
the devil is always in the details. those details are on every level you look at: human minds, nature around us, space. so if your inputs are vague, you should only expect outputs that are vague and generalized
Measles has a vaccine, ebola isn't found in the wild in the West. The chances of catching either from a random person at a meetup are basically zero.
It is no longer a pandemic which is killing tens of thousands of people, but covid is very much still around, and there's no true long-term vaccine for it. A lot of people with it are going to be more-or-less asymptomatic.
However, for a small bunch of immunocompromised people it is still very much life-altering or even deadly. For them catching it is just Not An Option, so if you want them at a large-scale meetup like this you'll have to ask all attendants to make the offer of spending a few seconds taking the $2 test.
Decca navigation gear was common in British boats operating in near coastal waters right up to the 70s and 80s. The fundamentals of how this system worked were not radically different to the beam systems used for navigation in the war.
>I recognize that Russia is making this change for MitM spying
Nope, they do it primarily out of necessity, because of the mounting pressure on the previously used CAs. The MitM capability is just a nice side bonus.
>So I empathize with the sarcasm, but best not to offer MitM proponents (whether in Russia or the U.S. or elsewhere!) an argument that could be used against your viewpoint.
If browsers truly cared about user security they would've provided reasonable conditions for supporting national CAs:
- Limit its authority only to respective national domain zones.
- Mandate use of Certificate Transparency to prevent MitM by an independent third party.
But this debacle only shows that western-controlled (especially financial) systems can be and will be used as a pressure tool, so any sane big enough sovereign nation will not trust them. And the taken actions only contribute to further fragmentation of the Internet across national and block borders.
With all due respect, being cocksure enough to declare that the Dunning-Kruger effect is definitely a thing, even when more careful analysis shows that the study conclusions were in error due to faulty analysis in the original study, kinda sounds like the perfect example of the Dunning-Kruger effect...
Sorry, you’re just uncultured if you don’t understand that understandings of different “foreign” cultures differ from place to place.
I don’t even agree that the use of the term “beef patty” should be regulated just so you don’t confuse a dumb tourist lol. Getting something you didn’t expect is part of travelling. But YOUR comment is too condescending and hypocritical to NOT draw attention to, and it’s a type of hypocrisy that’s endemic to North America. You tell someone from the US that you don’t know Spanish or some aspect of Mexican culture or something like that and if they’re snooty enough they’ll call you an uncultured trailer park hick or something. Put another 1,000–2,000 km of distance to the cultural reference you’re making and you’ll get blank stares.
I live in a country that’s far further from the Caribbean, where it makes up an insignificant part of our vast multicultural landscape. Don’t act like I’m “uncultured” due to something that you’re much more likely to know about due to your geographic proximity.
Yes, it's a single point of failure by design - but has been pretty stable mostly - with this and a previous attack in June being exceptions.
The identity portal is administered by the department for digital services, but hosted at a commercial provider, Vivicta (formerly TietoEvery, formerly Tieto and Every - Consulting companies from Finland and Norway).
I was expecting the site it’s talking about to have faked an instant response. Ironically, sometimes it goes the other way and UIs have to fake a small delay otherwise the user won’t believe it’s actually done anything (although arguably the real issue there is lack of positive feedback, not response time.)
Not so much this specific structure as the structure at all, the ownership of energy resources.
In a country like the US somebody owns the coal. They didn't make that coal, but we decided they can own it anyway, and so even though they didn't make the coal and it's never going to be replaced, just destroyed for all time, they get to capture the economic value from that.
Nobody, even in the US, owns the wind, and a wind farm doesn't capture some finite wind and gradually use it up, there's more wind where that came from, essentially forever.
Solar is even worse, because it works at a tiny scale. Owning your own wind turbine almost never makes sense but owning some solar panels makes sense for most owner-occupiers, especially if you live outside a city.
I don't think Trump would care whether the guy handing him an "America's Best Ever President" trophy and a $5Bn check is a Californian Sunlight Baron or a Wyoming Coal Baron, but the problem is that there can't be a Californian Sunlight Baron. You can't own California's sunlight, that's not a thing.
> Honestly, we don't really need to learn any more.
Perhaps for your task of closing Jira tickets that’s true - but the you have a decision to make: wait until you’re eliminated or try to anticipate where future competitiveness comes from.
You must be young. In time, you will see that it's the general model for how things work throughout the system. Double standards. From LE, Banking, Industry, Mil, to the piratebay -- it's the inverted pyramid of power. Look around and you will see it literally everywhere. And it's about to get substantially worse.
What you will also learn is the futility of attempting to apply logic to it. Cleverly identifying the pattern will only result in cauliflower ears and a short life. It's the elephant in the livingroom you're better off pretending not to see.
Publishing a list of real estate owners impacted by a tax is wrong? I find that incredibly hard to believe as a proponent of open and transparent government. My property valuations are public record, my property taxes on those properties is public record, any exemptions are public record. This is a sql query, not a witch hunt.
I’ve always wanted a version of this sort of a timeline that really lets you zoom out and in to the fractal complexity of it all. Right at the end we’re talking about updating the DOM and rendering… there’s a whole Unicode and font stack and rasterization process happening in there.
a great article, one can somewhat expect this given the history of research in major psychological phenomena: Stockholm syndrome, prison experiment, etc etc
as for the arrogant people - of course they do exist, but it does not really warrant an "effect" of its own name, especially that most of us know in one way or the other why estimations fail and how it happens too
I actually don't love regular expressions. But honestly I think it implementations that make me dislike using them.
They are unclear.
Using regular expressions in just about every language I've used has had this programming language vs regular expression language ambiguity that makes them hard to recommend in production past minimal complexity.
I don't like to hand off code to my coworkers where it's unclear if a character is part of the quoting system, part of the programming language, part of the regular expression syntax, or a character to match literally.
for example, what if the program variable foo contained "abc" and you wanted that to be matched by a regular expression. each language has a different way of doing this and reviewing the code has a high chance of an error unless the person is really pedantically accurate regarding regular expressions.
Excerpt: Starting Saturday, for a fee of up to $100,000 a month, trading firms can access "Truth API" to get a glimpse of the president's often market-moving announcements about economic policy and global affairs before the rest of the world.
Basically, for $100K a month you get insider info earlier than others, which you can use to make investment decisions. (Some might call this insider trading.)
Hi! I'm a pragmatic, product-focused software engineer with 8.5+ years of experience building and shipping web products with React, Next.js, TypeScript, Node.js and shadcn/ui.
Passionate about UX and product design.
In my spare time, I've been working on EasyInvoicePDF - a free, open-source invoice generator.
> Fiber and railroads don't need tens of billions of dollars in continuing yearly maintenance expenses to keep them from going stale.
Congrats, you're as qualified as all the private equity companies that have been piling into railroads!
That's precisely the sort of attitude that got us East Palestine (and others.)
BNSF (for example) spends billions of dollars a year on maintenance. When trains go over rails enough it can mess with the ballast and they have to come through with machines that lift the rail and jiggle the ballast and place the rail back at the correct height. And non-concrete ties have to be replaced every so often. Signals need maintenance. Switches need maintenance. Sensor/scanner shacks need maintenance. Etc.
Railroads have been dramatically cutting back because of pressure from PE, so the estimate is probably low.
>Fiber and railroads don't depreciate after 3 years of use like AI chips.
Are you seriously arguing that infrastructure doesn't depreciate? Tell me you've never done anything other than push bits, without telling me. Fiber gets eaten by backhoes trying to show off to potential mates in the spring, washed out, run over, knocked down by drunk drivers (if on telephone poles, not all of it is buried), has to be relocated because of other works, suffers water intrusion, amplifiers fail, you name it.
