But it did deliver results, confessions that were directly cited by the US Commander in Chief to justify the invasion of Iraq.
This poses a further question. Was the invasion decided apon based on the belief such intelligence was true or was this confession rather something to justify a decision ?
Winston Churchill's criticism of torture is that it was not useful because you were told what you want to hear - under torture the victim will say anything to make it stop.
Enhanced Interrogation is a euphemism. That the actions described in the article are torture is clear.
This poses a further question. Was the invasion decided apon based on the belief such intelligence was true or was this confession rather something to justify a decision ?
Winston Churchill's criticism of torture is that it was not useful because you were told what you want to hear - under torture the victim will say anything to make it stop.
Enhanced Interrogation is a euphemism. That the actions described in the article are torture is clear.