Thanks so much for your very detailed explanation! With interop, do you mean FFI... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

spraak on July 19, 2016 | parent | context | favorite | on: What Template Haskell gets wrong and Racket gets r...

Thanks so much for your very detailed explanation! With interop, do you mean FFI?

For R7RS-large, are there plans for a module standard?

_delirium on July 19, 2016 [–]

Maybe interop isn't quite the right term. I meant being able to write portable Scheme code, something that can run on, say, both Guile and Bigloo. The current standard leaves so much undefined that most practical Scheme code is nonportable.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact