Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Although I agree that Stack[Overflow|Exchange] will never been a mainstream site, I think there's an important difference in that SO is very useful to the community that it does support.

They've really nailed the technical question 'problem' to the point that my day-to-day job would be measurably harder without it, and so as the poster says I can easily imagine paying for added-value features there.

Quora, not so much. Although I really doubt the solution is to add more eye-candy to the page design. Sheesh, web designers. ;-)



From the article:

"The site is visually bland: there’s barely any color or images, and you won’t find any effect fancier than rounded corners."

Somebody please save us from the attack of web design. If I see another gradient rounded flashing Javascript-enabled button for gradient rounded flashing Javascript-enabled buttons' sake, I'm gonna hurl, Wayne's World style.


Flashing buttons? Sounds like you're frequenting some dark alleys. Make sure your anti-virus is up-to-date.


agreed. look at craigslist - about as unsexy a design as you could imagine, but it solves real problems for people, and they use it constantly. quora - not so much, and fancier buttons and UI won't really change that.


His point wasn't about making it more fancy but rather, less sterile. Even Craigslist has more character.


Well, to be fair there was a certain kind of logic behind my "shiny buttons will save Quora" argument:

1) Pivot 2) Redesign 3) Existing members come for the redesign and stay for the new Quora, thus giving the new strategy a chance.

Although you could say that when all you have is Photoshop, every site looks like it needs to be redesigned… ;)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: