Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In other interviews the engineers claim the levees were built to a 200-year level, and that a 100-year level would not have been sufficient for Ida.


If we get 100-year storms every five years, then is that really the correct description?


From the USGS page on 100 year floods (https://www.usgs.gov/special-topic/water-science-school/scie...):

> The term "100-year flood" is used in an attempt to simplify the definition of a flood that statistically has a 1-percent chance of occurring in any given year. Likewise, the term "100-year storm" is used to define a rainfall event that statistically has this same 1-percent chance of occurring. In other words, over the course of 1 million years, these events would be expected to occur 10,000 times. But, just because it rained 10 inches in one day last year doesn't mean it can't rain 10 inches in one day again this year.

And it looks like these terms are based on past data not future projections:

> Since the 100-year flood level is statistically computed using past, existing data, as more data comes in, the level of the 100-year flood will change (especially if a huge flood hits in the current year). As more data are collected, or when a river basin is altered in a way that affects the flow of water in the river, scientists re-evaluate the frequency of flooding.


The entire rest of the west bank parishes is still protected by the "old" definition of a 100 year storm, and they had multiple breeches this year.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: