Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It often costs more energy to buy local food than to transport it 1/2 way around the world. Boats are amazingly efficient, trucks are not.


Actually, robots growing things on the roof of your house will use even less fuel.


This might look like a good idea, but you need to include the energy costs from building all those tiny robots. Fixing them when they break down. Building a strong enough roof to hold them, 6 inches of topsoil and your crop. Irrigation and fertilizer and pesticides for that crop. Storage space for that crop for the better part of a year including some form of climate control to minimize spoilage etc etc.

Honestly, sectioning off the mid west and transporting the food to you by trains is actually a much better idea. You can still use robots but you get to use really big and cheap ones that do a simple job and get regular maintenance by people that know what their doing. You can also minimize the contamination from air pollution etc.

PS: Moving 2 weeks supply of food around the world by boat can easily take less energy than driving to a 5 miles to the super market to pick it up. If you want to be as environmentally friendly as possible, move to a big city and become a vegetarian. Living in the countryside feels more natural but it's much much worse for the planet.


Once robots are growing the food, a lot less of it will be imported. Even with the cost of maintenance, robots will be cheaper than human labor, eliminating a major reason for importing.

I guess if you think of robots as they are today, it may seem like they'd break down a lot. But agricultural robots will eventually be more like insects and, like many living things, cheaper to replace than repair.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: