Fine; replace 'offended' with 'disappointed.' My point--which you seem to have missed--is the same.
I'm not addressing the issue of gender discrimination.
I'm saying that your rhetorical approach, which seems to be "loudly proclaim that everyone should magically see things the same way I do," is ridiculous.
What part is magic? I'm saying to take the testimony of women who are either in the field or have attempted to join as evidence. Were you just nit-picking at my use of "it's not up for debate"?
I'm not addressing the issue of gender discrimination.
I'm saying that your rhetorical approach, which seems to be "loudly proclaim that everyone should magically see things the same way I do," is ridiculous.