No, I'm sorry. I'm not a linguist so I only know the relation between Gold's result and linguistics second-hand. I'm more interested in it from the point of view of inductive generalisation in machine learning; that's my schtick.
Just to make sure I didn't hallucinate all that, I had an admittedly perfunctory search online and I could find this paper:
Whose introduction describes how Gold's result is considered to support the arguments for linguistic nativism from the poverty of the stimulus. Then again, the author doesn't seem to be a linguist himself and he doesn't give any more specific references, so I'm now a little worried; and your question remains un-answered.
Have you tried wading through Chomsky's early work on linguistics? I don't have the courage to. The closest I've got to is I have a friend who has read a couple of Chomsky's linguistics books. My friend is making a living as an astrologist now so maybe that's a bit of a warning there :P
(not who you asked) I thought this would be in the linked transcript, but it's not. Norvig must be getting it from elsewhere (maybe in the 404ed video?), but it seems like misrepresentation.
Do you know where Chomsky refers (directly or indirectly) to Gold? I've been searching for a reference for some time.