Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In your own home, with a standard 50" TV, would there actually be any visible difference between 1080p and 4K? Aren't we reaching the limits of human perception?


From far enough away anything looks good. If you look at the THX recommendations for cinema setup, they add up to something like a 60 degree viewing angle on the screen. To match human eye resolution you want approximately one pixel every 0.3-0.4 arc minutes; let's say 3 pixels / arc minute, or 180 pixels/degree. So for a screen that was "perfect" up to the limits of human perception, taking up a cinema-screen-sized area of your vision, you'd need at least 180*60~=10000 horizontal pixels.

We're approaching the limits of human perception, but we're not there yet; 4K does seem like a useful improvement over 1080


A 50" TV today is like a 15" computer screen was fifteen years ago. What about the future where you can pick up a 200" screen at Costco for $300?

1080p is decent enough for a ~50" TV, but for 60"+ you'd probably want 2K and for 100"+ you'd almost certainly appreciate 4K.


Did Apple not just release a notebook with a 200-something dpi screen?


I don't know about you, but I sit somewhat further away from our 50" TV than I do to this 17" laptop. Probably about 4m or so.

Having said that, even at that distance high quality HD content is noticeably better than standard resolution content.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: