Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Edit: I meant to say functional not pure functional. Blog post changed.


I question your qualification to advise people on interviews if your own theory knowledge tops out at "casually skimmed a wikipedia page."


He's making the distinction between saying a language is "functional" versus "pure functional." It is not correct to classify Lisp and Erlang as pure functional languages, because they both include support for imperative style programming.





Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: