Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin



Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.

If shown to scale even the biggest satellite wouldn't take up a pixel.


Well technically it's 'infinitely' big. Most people's brains breakdown when you start trying to tell them about the idea of a 4th dimension that holds the universe.

I think this is why humanity defaults to religion as explanation for the unknown; the God factor is easier to process, and there's a reward at the end for a life of good deeds.


>Most people's brains breakdown when you start trying to tell them about the idea of a 4th dimension that holds the universe.

Sorry I could not understand a single word.

Can you explain this a little bit more?


Here's a video that really helped me grasp the higher-order dimensions:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqeqW3g8N2Q


I imagine the average distance between these satellites is well over 100 km.


Thus continues the reddit-ization of this website. A shame. At least cite the man; "inside jokes" of this sort are tired.


> Thus continues the reddit-ization of this website.

You know what was even worse on reddit than the memes and inside jokes? The posts whining about how much better the site was before X happened.

This is the internet, no one will listen to whining. If you want to preserve the nature of HN, find something constructive to do. If a comment is so devoid of content that you cannot constructively turn it into a useful conversation, downvote it and spend your time building a conversation somewhere else. Complaining is easy, but it just adds to the noise that you're so concerned about.


So are ad-hominem attacks.

The first line is a quote from Douglas Adams. Well known to anyone who has tried to run a conjunction analysis and had to set the range to 50 km to get something to show up.


Yes, it's quite plain that it is not the commenter's own voice. It is also a short step from self-gratifying quote continuation threads.


This is a completely accurate and to scale representation of Earth orbit.


http://www.esa.int/esaMI/ESOC/SEMN2VM5NDF_mg_3_s.html

The debris field shown in the image is an artist's impression based on actual data. However the image does not show debris items in their actual size or density. Note: The debris objects shown in the images are an artist's impression based on actual density data. However, the debris objects are shown at an eggagerated size to make them visible at the scale shown.


The sheer sight of that simulated model makes me wonder if you're being sarcastic, but the story doesn't say whether it's a simulation or just made up.


He's joking. We don't have satellites the size of entire cities. If this were to scale, it would look exactly like the pictures of earth we are used to seeing with nothing but black surrounding it.

There's a lot of space debris, but there's a whole heck of a lot more "space."




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: