Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

i mean you said it yourself, the internet is global. those few thousand can have impressions of hundreds of millions. whether they do their cam shows abroad or local matters little. it's the inherent incentivization approved by a government that leads to deeper cultural erosion. if you're in a poor country with no access to education, and your only way into the US is porn, then that's what will ultimately win, rather than incentivizing higher education, etc. And before an argument is made that this will just be a way to get in and then those folks will go and seek PHDs and be productive members of society--i have a bridge to sell you.


If a person immigrates to the USA due to success with onlyfans, are they not productive members of society by virtue of having taxable & disposable income from the fruits of their labor? They don't need a PHD to be productive anymore than a soccer player, mentioned earlier. In reality we already have American citizens in the US paying for their college degrees via onlyfans.


Sex sells and everybody knows that. Why should the government use antiquated-at-best moral codes to discriminate against people who will increase the global influence of the country? Cultural exportation and exploitation have been key to US soft power for nearly a century.


crack also sells, amongst many other things that are inherently horrible for broad modern society.

> Why should the government use antiquated-at-best moral codes to discriminate against people who will increase the global influence of the country

this is a very loaded statement that assumes that everyone is in agreement that proliferating and rewarding cam models is some kind of inherent good. there's nothing antiquated morally with simply not rewarding it. i'm not stating to ban it outright. there's always use in it at the long tail of society


> i'm not stating to ban it outright. there's always use in it at the long tail of society

You might not have any interest in adult entertainment, but that doesn’t mean the industry only exists in the “long tail of society”.

The problem with social taboos is rarely a moral one, and usually more that people feel embarrassed or scared to be open and honest.

And usually that stems from others being unreasonably judgmental.


> The problem with social taboos is rarely a moral one, and usually more that people feel embarrassed or scared to be open and honest.

And usually that stems from others being unreasonably judgmental.

You're using broad sweeping statements to argue with a point that I'm not even making.

First off, you're only assuming I'm making this argument because I don't have an interest in adult entertainment. I just don't believe it needs to be shoved into every facet of society. The industry certainly _does_ exist in the long tail, because there's literally nothing interesting in it aside from the fact that people use it to get off and move on with their lives. It's like taking a dump. Everyone does it, but I don't need to sit around a dinner table discussing it as if it's some high brow art. And I certainly don't want people to be treated extra specially because they excel at taking dumps.


Nobody was suggesting that models should or would talk about adult content at the dinner table. What a weird comparison to make.

My point was literally that it’s a bigger industry than you give credit to because it’s a topic that isn’t generally discussed in polite conversation.

But I don’t think this is a topic we are likely to agree on. So perhaps it’s better to agree to disagree.


It worked for melania!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: