Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

IMO this is unfair for GPL or similarly licensed code.

Seems ok for MIT like licensed code though



It's totally fair to use GPL code, it just means all the models built by Anthropic, OpenAI, etc. using GPL-licensed source are themselves bound by the GPL. Plus, any works created downstream using those AI tools.

We're on the verge of a golden age of software as soon as someone finds a court with courage.


Ah, you have much more faith in the legal system than I do. It's nice to dream, though.


There's no difference. Either you need to follow the license or you don't. MIT has requirements still.


I think AI will create an open source dark age. Gradually, we'll see a lot less new good open source code. A gradual shift back to the proprietary world. Simmilar to the 1950-1990 period.


Why would giving more people software freedom and the ability to reverse engineer nonfree code result in a dark age?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: