Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

He's just saying the article does not even discuss this vital distinction, let alone bring evidence either way.


It's impossible to prove the nonexistance and mentioning hearsay wouldn't be good.

The onus is on the commentator to substantiate his claims of there being a rationale.


Well, that is not true. The 'nonexistance' part. All new car phone home, and that is somewhere on the world.


Ironic coming from the country with three domestic OEMs, and routinely threatens economic annexation of my country


It also doesn't discuss if the polestar was made of asbestos or if it was dangerous to unicorn spawning habitat.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: