> The bombing of the school was horrible, but it was a mistake
Please don't say this. It wasn't a mistake.
The very FIRST strike packages of the war are very clearly vetted. If you are involved in military planning, you know this.
They doubled tapped it after seeing people flee inside the save the children.
The goal here was to teach IRGC a lesson and demoralize Iranians, which clearly backfired.
Furthermore, US has been contentiously bombing civilian buildings, bridges, hospitals throughout the war. They have also bombed water desalination plants and other key infrastructure.
You have the US president threatening to use nuclear weapons and end the Persian civilization.
Ignoring the obvious joke about "random incidents" in schools regularly in America, is it not the case that the country with the most capacity to retaliate anywhere in the world would not be "demoralized"? I see the possibility that the effect of such terrorism might be different from place to place.
I find it totally implausible that the president or any subordinates intentionally targeted a school. As I recall it was located next to a military base. A mistake seems more likely.
Please don't say this. It wasn't a mistake.
The very FIRST strike packages of the war are very clearly vetted. If you are involved in military planning, you know this.
They doubled tapped it after seeing people flee inside the save the children.
The goal here was to teach IRGC a lesson and demoralize Iranians, which clearly backfired.
Furthermore, US has been contentiously bombing civilian buildings, bridges, hospitals throughout the war. They have also bombed water desalination plants and other key infrastructure.
You have the US president threatening to use nuclear weapons and end the Persian civilization.
Let's not pretend.