This usually gives enough accuracy for the purposes of floating point.
However, I'm not sure if "pow" can be usefully implemented this way. I am guessing no, because pow grows faster than any polynomial eventually...
edit: Hmm, pow at least looks linear here: http://www.netlib.org/fdlibm/e_pow.c
This usually gives enough accuracy for the purposes of floating point.
However, I'm not sure if "pow" can be usefully implemented this way. I am guessing no, because pow grows faster than any polynomial eventually...
edit: Hmm, pow at least looks linear here: http://www.netlib.org/fdlibm/e_pow.c