Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Actually, Sciencegeekgirl.com adds VERY MUCH to the article, namely a highly interesting discussion of WHY students give these wrong answers. No, it's not because they're stupid or ignorant.


> it's not because they're stupid or ignorant

They may not be stupid, but that's pretty much the definition of ignorance.


Obviously, anyone who answers a question incorrectly is ignorant of the correct answer, but the point is that in many cases the wrong answer seems to be logically based on a wrong mental model of how gravity works. Just like Aristotelian physics. And Newtonian physics as well. Would you call Aristotle and Newton ignorant?

The interesting part is the discussion of what these wrong mental models look like and how you can teach a correct one.


> Would you call Aristotle and Newton ignorant?

Absolutely. There was much they did not know, as is true of anyone. "Ignorant" is not an insult, it simply means you do not know something. Would you say Aristotle and Newton knew everything about everything? If not, then they would be, by definition, ignorant of the things they did not know.


> Would you call Aristotle and Newton ignorant?

By modern standards, absolutely.


> Would you call Aristotle and Newton ignorant?

By your definition they're ignorant, but not stupid?


There's absolutely no way to justify a student attending a physics class and not knowing that the Moon does have gravity as well.


The problem is that they may know that the Moon has gravity, but they don't understand what that concretely means when it comes to questions like this.


I would dispute the validity of calling that state of mind "knowing that the moon has gravity". I would instead call it "memorized a couple of correlated keywords".


No. Where writing is concerned, 2+2 is greater than 4.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: