Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So what are the arguments against what he is doing?

Seems fine to me, and sounds like it's likely to be adding value.



The argument against would be that 2.7M articles containing no useful content is not helpful. (Assuming, which I do, that the articles do not contain useful content).


They contain loots of useful information

Here is an article from an earlier comment, https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eutriana_repens

After reading that I know that Bouteloua repens is a form of grass. Who first identified it. Who gave it is current name and some other common names for the plant.

I think it is amazing. If someone has already filed in a the information it just seams like a waste of man hours to retype it to Wikipedia.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: